top of page
  • Writer's pictureBrad Parker


Updated: Aug 31, 2022

Mission? What are you talking about? I just want to learn how to defend myself and protect my family.

Great. You are not alone here on this blog.

criminal with knife
Think about what you are trying to do in your self-defense and personal security plan.

We study and deploy the tactics, techniques, and procedures that are more consistent with this type of role -- the role that we as private citizens, executive protection agents, and security personal will primarily be concerned with.

Military operators and law enforcement personnel have different missions and spend their time learning and training the TTPs that are consistent with their mission. For example law enforcement officers train to discharge their duty to identify, apprehend, control, arrest suspects, and preserve evidence. Military peacekeepers are often charged with counterinsurgency operations. Or policing volatile areas. Or humanitarian assistance to impoverished areas get my point.

Because they have different missions than us, they need different equipment, different training, and often a different mindset.


The good news is this identification of our particular mission allows us to concentrate our finite time and resources into the skills and training that are applicable for us. We don't have to continually pursue skills and knowledge which are not germane to our mission. For example, if you are in the military, you might devote a significant amount of time and effort to be airborne qualified. Or dive qualified. Now, skydiving and scuba diving might be really exciting, but it's not necessary for our training with our civilian protection roles.


The bad new is our society is changing as it fractures along social, cultural, and governmental lines. Increased lawfare, organized social pressure, and changing applications of the law for different segments is now having a dramatic affect on how we approach self-defense. It has all of us constantly evaluating our strategies for self-defense.


When people ask about the work system I employ for firearms, my answer takes into account my mission. The firearms I employ are compact with the capability of a high volume of firepower to break contact and escape.

It's a very simplistic system centering on two guns: a handgun and a carbine. It's not literally two guns, it's two platforms: the Glock handgun and the M4/AR-15 carbine.

This allows:

  • having the option to carry individual firearms of different sizes (full-size duty, compact, subcompact);

  • they can all share the same magazines and same ammo;

  • they follow the same exact manual of arms. In other words, when I pick up one, it operates exactly like all the others.

NOTE: You might think about switching the carbine for a shotgun if your main objective is to defend your house, condo, or apartment. In my company, shotguns are rarely used by the teams I'm a part of with the exception of some residential teams (they are tasked with protecting the principal and family at home). Additionally, at least one of those teams had their shotguns set to fire less lethal bean bag rounds.

This system works well for my protective services/executive protection mission because we spend the bulk of our resources identifying and avoiding potential conflicts. Our priorities are:

  1. Detect

  2. Deter

  3. Deny

  4. Delay

  5. Defend

Notice that 'Defend' is at the bottom of the list. If we are in a firefight, we have failed in the higher priorities. The best fight is the one you avoid.

Even if we are in the Defend mode, we are still looking to evacuate the principal. We are looking to break contact and get out of Dodge.

Hence, the choices for my equipment and platforms. Your system can be different, depending on your mission. And I implore you to consider your mission now to focus your vision and maximize your resources.

Defining your mission now gives you the advantage by:

  1. Having an overarching strategy you can deploy without thinking about what do to during the attack.

  2. Concentrating your focus on the skills and attributes you'll need.

  3. Narrowing your choice of defensive tools and firearms necessary to fill your mission.

We are all bound by the limits of time and money. The three points above have the ability to limit your scope to the most important items. This focus gives you the structure to deliberately practice and train to become a virtuoso in your protective skills.


We probably won't get much pushback on the wisdom of focusing your vision to maximize your effectiveness.

That all sounds well and good from an intellectual standpoint. But many students can find themselves slipping into a churning cauldron of training and equipment choices because they have let the parameters of their mission expand and, perhaps, the stringent focus can get boring.

Here's where we get people arguing about terminal ballistics of rifle rounds at more than 1000 yards. Here's where we get people who have different platforms for different activities. They enjoy shooting a number of different platforms and a number calibers.

But are they losing sight of their original mission?

Again, that depends on the original mission. If your mission is area denial or anti-material duties at 500 yards and out, then your equipment choices and arguments regarding .338 Lapua versus .300 WinMag are probably justified.

If your mission is executive protection in a permissive environment or you are a CCW holder interested in personal protection, the above argument is probably not germane to your mission. It might be fun, but not applicable.

Focus on what you need to fulfill your mission at the basic level. Then, add to your attributes and skills in a way that builds your capabilities to a higher level.



Our quest never stops. It can get sidelined sometimes, but we never stop.

#self-defense, #personal protection

26 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page